This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.snow
Recipients Arfrever, alex, asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, flox, gregory.p.smith, josh.r, pitrou, refi64, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tonn81, yselivanov
Date 2014-12-17.06:31:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I'm open to suggestions on how to help make the patch more reviewable.  Currently at roughly +2500 lines of code it's a lot to ask someone to review.  While probably not the only way to help reviewers, I expect the best thing I could do is to split the patch up into several smaller parts.

However, I could use some insight into the best way to approach that.  I keep considering factoring out the iterator/view boilerplate into helpers (macros?) in a separate patch.  That would go a long way to making the actual cOrderedDict implementation more reasonably sized.  I'm just not convinced yet it's the *right* approach.
Date User Action Args
2014-12-17 06:31:12eric.snowsetrecipients: + eric.snow, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, alex, asvetlov, flox, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, refi64, josh.r, tonn81
2014-12-17 06:31:12eric.snowsetmessageid: <>
2014-12-17 06:31:12eric.snowlinkissue16991 messages
2014-12-17 06:31:11eric.snowcreate