Message 232250 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	hakril
Recipients	hakril, mark.dickinson, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2014-12-06.20:08:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1417896496.07.0.755848796156.issue22939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Here is a first try for a patch. There are two points I am not sure about: 1) The message for the OverflowError: is that explicit enough ? 2) The behaviour of the iterator after the raise of OverflowError. With this patch every call to `next(it)` where `it` have overflowed will raise `OverflowError` again. Does this behaviour seems correct our should it raise StopIteration after the first OverflowError ?

Here is a first try for a patch.

There are two points I am not sure about:

1) The message for the OverflowError: is that explicit enough ?

2) The behaviour of the iterator after the raise of OverflowError. 
With this patch every call to `next(it)` where `it` have overflowed will raise `OverflowError` again.
Does this behaviour seems correct our should it raise StopIteration after the first OverflowError ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-12-06 20:08:16	hakril	set	recipients: + hakril, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
2014-12-06 20:08:16	hakril	set	messageid: <1417896496.07.0.755848796156.issue22939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-06 20:08:16	hakril	link	issue22939 messages
2014-12-06 20:08:15	hakril	create