This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author berker.peksag
Recipients berker.peksag, demian.brecht, ezio.melotti
Date 2014-12-04.03:56:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1417665385.22.0.423071821516.issue22992@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
+The workflow of a developer might look something like this:

"a core developer" or "a contributor"? It would be good to split core developer and contributor workflows.

+    # address review comments and merge
+    git checkout master
+    git merge issueA
+    git branch -d issueA

For example, from the contributor side, you shouldn't touch the master branch at all.

It should be:

    # address review comments
    git commit -a
    # check upstream and rebase
    git pull --rebase upstream master  # or "origin master" in this example
    # push changes (optional)
    git push origin issueA  # origin should be contributor's fork here
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-04 03:56:25berker.peksagsetrecipients: + berker.peksag, ezio.melotti, demian.brecht
2014-12-04 03:56:25berker.peksagsetmessageid: <1417665385.22.0.423071821516.issue22992@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-04 03:56:25berker.peksaglinkissue22992 messages
2014-12-04 03:56:24berker.peksagcreate