Message232047
On 02.12.2014 20:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Le 02/12/2014 19:59, Marc-Andre Lemburg a écrit :
>>
>> My main point was that we shouldn't start adding tags for e.g.
>> PPC, Intel, ARM, etc. since platforms needing to support multiple
>> such architectures will typically support fat builds anyway.
>>
>> How about using these flags:
>>
>> b0 - 16-bit
>> b1 - 32-bit
>> b2 - 64-bit
>> b3 - 128-bit
>
> Fair enough, although I think we only need 32-bit and 64-bit for now,
> and "32b" vs. "64b" would probably be more readable :-)
True, I'm just not sure what the parsing requirements are and
the ABI version names are too long already, IMO. PEP 425 used
a nice short variant for the Python part. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-12-02 19:51:22 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower |
2014-12-02 19:51:22 | lemburg | link | issue22980 messages |
2014-12-02 19:51:21 | lemburg | create | |
|