Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2014-12-02.19:10:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <547E0EA8.6000704@free.fr>
In-reply-to <547E0C11.7040200@egenix.com>
Content
Le 02/12/2014 19:59, Marc-Andre Lemburg a écrit :
> 
> My main point was that we shouldn't start adding tags for e.g.
> PPC, Intel, ARM, etc. since platforms needing to support multiple
> such architectures will typically support fat builds anyway.
> 
> How about using these flags:
> 
> b0 - 16-bit
> b1 - 32-bit
> b2 - 64-bit
> b3 - 128-bit

Fair enough, although I think we only need 32-bit and 64-bit for now,
and "32b" vs. "64b" would probably be more readable :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-02 19:10:35pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower
2014-12-02 19:10:35pitroulinkissue22980 messages
2014-12-02 19:10:34pitroucreate