Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2014-12-02.18:02:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1417543333.2.0.0650717576383.issue22980@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I assume the hard part will be getting the details for Linux (doesn't bitness 
> have to be compiled in there? For Windows it can be determined at compile-
> time...), but preferring an extension with the ABI tag and falling back on
> one without seems easy enough.

Sticking to bitness should be easy (although I wonder if it would be desirable for platforms with fat binaries - Ned?). If we can go the extra mile and include platform identification all the better, of course.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-02 18:02:13pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower
2014-12-02 18:02:13pitrousetmessageid: <1417543333.2.0.0650717576383.issue22980@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-02 18:02:13pitroulinkissue22980 messages
2014-12-02 18:02:13pitroucreate