Message230660
I'm not sure what would be the best way to support negative limit for stack functions. Actually, I think the current behavior is not intuitive. For example we could make positive limit mean the same thing for traceback and stack functions (load N entries, starting from the caller), but in that case the change will inverse the behavior of code that uses stack functions. Since the traceback module is mostly used for printing/formatting the difference won't be crucial. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-11-05 06:13:51 | vaultah | set | recipients:
+ vaultah, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
2014-11-05 06:13:51 | vaultah | set | messageid: <1415168031.45.0.711261710777.issue22619@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-11-05 06:13:51 | vaultah | link | issue22619 messages |
2014-11-05 06:13:50 | vaultah | create | |
|