This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ethan.furman
Recipients eric.araujo, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, python-dev, r.david.murray
Date 2014-11-03.20:37:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1415047038.39.0.213432984086.issue22780@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
+   Special value which should be returned by the special methods
+   (:meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, etc.) to indicate
+   that the operation is not implemented with respect to the other type.

After a discussion on python-dev, I think this wording could be even clearer.  How about:

    Special value which should be returned by the binary special methods
    (e.g. :meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, :meth:`__rsub__`,
    etc.) to indicate that the operation is not implemented with respect to
    the other type; may be returned by the in-place binary special methods
    (e.g. :meth:`__imul__`, :meth:`__iand__`, etc.) for the same purpose.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-11-03 20:37:18ethan.furmansetrecipients: + ethan.furman, georg.brandl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, python-dev
2014-11-03 20:37:18ethan.furmansetmessageid: <1415047038.39.0.213432984086.issue22780@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-11-03 20:37:18ethan.furmanlinkissue22780 messages
2014-11-03 20:37:18ethan.furmancreate