Message230561
+ Special value which should be returned by the special methods
+ (:meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, etc.) to indicate
+ that the operation is not implemented with respect to the other type.
After a discussion on python-dev, I think this wording could be even clearer. How about:
Special value which should be returned by the binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, :meth:`__rsub__`,
etc.) to indicate that the operation is not implemented with respect to
the other type; may be returned by the in-place binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__imul__`, :meth:`__iand__`, etc.) for the same purpose. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-11-03 20:37:18 | ethan.furman | set | recipients:
+ ethan.furman, georg.brandl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, python-dev |
2014-11-03 20:37:18 | ethan.furman | set | messageid: <1415047038.39.0.213432984086.issue22780@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-11-03 20:37:18 | ethan.furman | link | issue22780 messages |
2014-11-03 20:37:18 | ethan.furman | create | |
|