Author r.david.murray
Recipients docs@python, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, r.david.murray, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vy0123
Date 2014-11-01.01:58:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1414807085.64.0.782853064601.issue22725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
We have a suggestion for a wording improvement (that does not change the sentence to which you refer) that has been accepted as better than the existing wording by a couple of committers.  This improvement is actually independent of what the variable is named.  The 2.7 docstring should also be fixed to show the actual argument name, IMO.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-11-01 01:58:05r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, docs@python, ethan.furman, vy0123
2014-11-01 01:58:05r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1414807085.64.0.782853064601.issue22725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-11-01 01:58:05r.david.murraylinkissue22725 messages
2014-11-01 01:58:05r.david.murraycreate