This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients gvanrossum, mathieui, pitrou, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-10-31.02:26:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJw+g9mZMOd26n39sy1fnZPaGomJwsh8wbTXkBcORAPoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1414695396.21.0.426025929736.issue22768@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Maybe

transport.get_extra_info('socket').getpeercert(True)

would be okay, no patch needed?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> > some methods take parameters (like the offender getpeercert(bool), or
> > get_channel_binding() that takes an element of
> > ssl.CHANNEL_BINDING_TYPES, list that may grow in the future) that need
> > to be covered in the properties
>
> That's a good point. I don't have any strong feelings either way. Perhaps
> other people want to chime in?
>
> As for the patch, it will need to add a unit test as well.
>
> ----------
> stage:  -> patch review
> versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22768>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-31 02:26:21gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, mathieui, yselivanov
2014-10-31 02:26:21gvanrossumlinkissue22768 messages
2014-10-31 02:26:21gvanrossumcreate