➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, eryksun, meador.inge, pitrou, steve.dower
Date 2014-10-27.19:20:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1414437637.73.0.66145969922.issue22732@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I missed c_size_t somehow, but as eryksun says, it's not strictly the same thing. Of course, my current patch isn't the same thing either as it only supports 32-bit and 64-bit pointer sizes.

I could make a bigger change to use c_void_p and compare its .value against None instead of 0 (which seems to be the only difference)?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-27 19:20:37steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, meador.inge, eryksun
2014-10-27 19:20:37steve.dowersetmessageid: <1414437637.73.0.66145969922.issue22732@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-10-27 19:20:37steve.dowerlinkissue22732 messages
2014-10-27 19:20:37steve.dowercreate