Author pitrou
Recipients Julian, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, michael.foord, pablomouzo, parkouss, pitrou, r.david.murray, rbcollins
Date 2014-10-08.17:48:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1412790502.83.0.0303917394634.issue11664@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hi Julien and welcome,

> - is this issue still open and needed ?

Yes and "perhaps". I have no opinion on whether it is necessary, but other people seem to think it's useful.

> - if yes, do I have to work from 3.3 branch, as stated in the issue "Versions" field, or in the default one ?

No, you should work with the default branch. Other branches only receive bug fixes, not improvements such as this.

If you haven't yet done so, you may also take a look at the devguide:
https://docs.python.org/devguide/
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-08 17:48:22pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, pablomouzo, daniel.urban, chris.jerdonek, Julian, martin.panter, parkouss
2014-10-08 17:48:22pitrousetmessageid: <1412790502.83.0.0303917394634.issue11664@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-10-08 17:48:22pitroulinkissue11664 messages
2014-10-08 17:48:22pitroucreate