Message228678
Agreed. If you want it to be a singleton in your code, use the singleton pattern in your code...but it is hard for me to see why that would be a good idea :) (ie: DRY). Globally, it does not seem to me that there are likely to be any significant number of identical definitions in non-related codebases, even absent the mutable-class issue. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-10-06 13:00:12 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, mark.dickinson, fhaxbox66@googlemail.com |
2014-10-06 13:00:12 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1412600412.33.0.648494198516.issue22562@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-10-06 13:00:12 | r.david.murray | link | issue22562 messages |
2014-10-06 13:00:12 | r.david.murray | create | |
|