This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author seberg
Recipients belopolsky, seberg, skrah
Date 2014-10-03.00:04:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1412294671.9852.6.camel@sebastian-t440>
In-reply-to <1412259864.08.0.604570083279.issue22445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Numpy 1.9. was only released recently, so 1.10. might be a while. If no
problems show up during release or until then, we will likely switch it
by then. But that could end up being a year from now, so I am not sure
if 3.6 might not fit better. The problems should be mostly mitigated on
our side. So bug-wise it shouldn't be a big issue I would guess.

I will try to look at it more soon, but am completly overloaded at least
for the next few days, and maybe some other numpy devs can chip in. Not
sure I get your last point, slicing should give the "organic" values
even for the mangled up thing with relaxed strides on (currently)?!
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-03 00:04:36sebergsetrecipients: + seberg, belopolsky, skrah
2014-10-03 00:04:36seberglinkissue22445 messages
2014-10-03 00:04:36sebergcreate