Author r.david.murray
Recipients Claudiu.Popa, berker.peksag, georg.brandl, pitrou, pjenvey, python-dev, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date 2014-09-29.15:29:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
After reconsidering Terry's idle example, it seems to me that the change could adversely impact existing code that already works around the lack of chained tracebacks, even as idle does.  So I committed this to 3.5 only as an enhancement.

Thanks Claudiu.

As an aside, isn't it a (pre-existing) bug that if an excepthook exists, it gets passed None for the traceback?
Date User Action Args
2014-09-29 15:29:43r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, pitrou, pjenvey, Claudiu.Popa, python-dev, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka
2014-09-29 15:29:43r.david.murraysetmessageid: <>
2014-09-29 15:29:43r.david.murraylinkissue17442 messages
2014-09-29 15:29:42r.david.murraycreate