Message 227803 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	Claudiu.Popa, berker.peksag, georg.brandl, pitrou, pjenvey, python-dev, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date	2014-09-29.15:29:42
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1412004583.1.0.220372899481.issue17442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
After reconsidering Terry's idle example, it seems to me that the change could adversely impact existing code that already works around the lack of chained tracebacks, even as idle does. So I committed this to 3.5 only as an enhancement. Thanks Claudiu. As an aside, isn't it a (pre-existing) bug that if an excepthook exists, it gets passed None for the traceback?

After reconsidering Terry's idle example, it seems to me that the change could adversely impact existing code that already works around the lack of chained tracebacks, even as idle does.  So I committed this to 3.5 only as an enhancement.

Thanks Claudiu.

As an aside, isn't it a (pre-existing) bug that if an excepthook exists, it gets passed None for the traceback?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-09-29 15:29:43	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, pitrou, pjenvey, Claudiu.Popa, python-dev, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka
2014-09-29 15:29:43	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <1412004583.1.0.220372899481.issue17442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-29 15:29:43	r.david.murray	link	issue17442 messages
2014-09-29 15:29:42	r.david.murray	create