Message22739
Logged In: YES
user_id=6133
OK, example script minimized.
Lambda arguments are not the problem; thanks for the pointer, but I'm not
having trouble with those.
I have determined that proper lambda is being used, but not indicated as shown
by attached script, which forces an exception to occur in the lambda function
but backtrace shows wrong lambda function. Reducing 2nd argument of 2nd
call to seq_func1 to 'num_args' instead of 'num_args+2' will not encounter the
error, but the nature of the implementation requires that it is using the correct
lambda, so it's the backtrace attribution that is apparently wrong.
Mea culpa: my original script version did request wrong 'num_args' causing
actual bug, but incorrect backtrace led me down an alternate path... I suspected
that I had some incorrect code, but I couldn't resolve that against the error
report. Still can't. :)
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:26:46 | admin | link | issue1048870 messages |
2007-08-23 14:26:46 | admin | create | |
|