Author belopolsky
Recipients AaronR, Alex.Willmer, BreamoreBoy, Erik Cederstrand, Erik.Cederstrand, aganders3, belopolsky, r.david.murray, tim.peters
Date 2014-09-22.14:52:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1411397554.23.0.523906921052.issue12006@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I find this footnote somewhat confusing:

"""
(8) Similar to %U and %W, %V is only used in calculations when the day of the week and the ISO year (%G) are specified when used with the strptime method.
"""

The existing footnote (7) is much clearer:

"""
(7) When used with the strptime() method, %U and %W are only used in calculations when the day of the week and the year are specified.
"""

Why not use the same language in (8)?

"""
(7) When used with the strptime() method, %V is only used in calculations when the day of the week and the ISO year (%G) are specified.

"""
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-22 14:52:34belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, tim.peters, r.david.murray, BreamoreBoy, Erik.Cederstrand, AaronR, aganders3, Erik Cederstrand, Alex.Willmer
2014-09-22 14:52:34belopolskysetmessageid: <1411397554.23.0.523906921052.issue12006@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-22 14:52:34belopolskylinkissue12006 messages
2014-09-22 14:52:34belopolskycreate