This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author kernc
Recipients gvanrossum, kernc, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, paul.moore, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2014-09-12.16:46:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAFh6oAwFZAoyhtVcfj=sR9QasMxFR_GwzH-s_jM+FmA4Pyuo8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1410236982.38.0.669278662648.issue22253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
>
> I am dubious that there are any with a mixture of both sections and
> additional option lines at the top without a section.
>

rsyncd.conf [1] is one such example, and I wouldn't say there aren't
countless more in the wild.

> Anyone writing an app and planning to parse a .ini file can add [Start] or
> [Setup] at the top.
>

Indeed. Here lies the problem of this unfortunate issue:
MissingSectionHeaderError is only ever caught [9] to mitigate this **awful
default behavior** and attach a dummy section at the top, as you say. Or
can anyone care to propose another relevant use case for this poorly (un-)
thought through exception?

> I think a more useful new configparser feature would be to keep comment
> lines and write them back out after a configuration is changed.
>

While this is very much off-topic, configobj [3] does too seem to have done
so since ages.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-12 16:46:15kerncsetrecipients: + kernc, gvanrossum, terry.reedy, paul.moore, lukasz.langa, tshepang, martin.panter
2014-09-12 16:46:15kernclinkissue22253 messages
2014-09-12 16:46:14kernccreate