Message226796
> Really, the test for whether to keep or remove the prefix should be to
> remove the prefix and try and resolve the path again. If it succeeds,
> remove the prefix; otherwise, keep it. This can only really be done as
> part of the resolve() call, which would address the original issue,
> but it may be quite a perf. hit.
It would also be prone to race conditions. All in all it sounds like a bad idea.
I still think it should be asked for explicitly. I don't know how the method should be called, .extended() perhaps? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-09-11 19:14:32 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, tim.golden, zach.ware, eryksun, steve.dower, Kevin.Norris |
2014-09-11 19:14:32 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1410462872.35.0.864959574012.issue22299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-09-11 19:14:32 | pitrou | link | issue22299 messages |
2014-09-11 19:14:32 | pitrou | create | |
|