➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gotgenes, hct, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, vstinner, wiggin15
Date 2014-09-10.23:57:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1410393424.59.0.792274841666.issue9951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Good point Terry - I split the proposal to support bytes-like objects for 'x' and 'X' in string formatting out to issue 22385.

For bytes.hex, I'm inclined to stick with the dirt simple option described in PEP 358: the exact behaviour of the current binascii.hexlify().
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-10 23:57:04ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, gotgenes, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, Arfrever, wiggin15, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, hct
2014-09-10 23:57:04ncoghlansetmessageid: <1410393424.59.0.792274841666.issue9951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-10 23:57:04ncoghlanlinkissue9951 messages
2014-09-10 23:57:04ncoghlancreate