Message22643
Logged In: YES
user_id=552329
Patch works for that case, yes. However...
[from python-dev]
> the test case I was using that triggered
> the need for that is 1906-12-31
> which is a Monday but changes what week
> it is based on whether you use U or W.
> which makes no sense since both U and W
> should consider it the same week.
> Had the same result for 1917-12-31.
Something's still not right here (this is with the patch):
>>> time.strptime("1917 51 1", "%Y %U %w")
(1917, 12, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 351, -1)
>>> time.strptime("1917 52 1", "%Y %U %w")
(1917, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0, 0, 365, -1)
1917 both started and ended on a Monday, so there are 53 U
weeks, right? (where the last 'week' is only one day). So
31/12/1917 should be U=53, W=52 |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:26:37 | admin | link | issue1045381 messages |
2007-08-23 14:26:37 | admin | create | |
|