This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Sjlver
Recipients Arfrever, Sjlver, bfroehle, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, pitrou, tarek
Date 2014-09-05.09:48:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1409910505.04.0.964360259347.issue5309@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Is there a reason this has not landed? The patch works perfectly for me, except for one issue:

    @@ -268,6 +275,9 @@
             if self.undef:
                 self.undef = self.undef.split(',')
     
    +        if self.parallel:
    +            self.parallel = int(self.parallel)
    +
             if self.swig_opts is None:
                 self.swig_opts = []
             else:

If self.parallel is True, this will set self.parallel to 1, causing it to use one worker instead of n (where n is the number of processors).

An updated patch is attached.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-05 09:48:25Sjlversetrecipients: + Sjlver, pitrou, christian.heimes, tarek, eric.araujo, Arfrever, bfroehle
2014-09-05 09:48:25Sjlversetmessageid: <1409910505.04.0.964360259347.issue5309@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-05 09:48:25Sjlverlinkissue5309 messages
2014-09-05 09:48:24Sjlvercreate