Message224893
Here's an initial patch with a fix that passes all the test cases other than the ones that are incorrect based on examples and pseudocode in RFC 3986. I haven't checked obsoleted RFCs yet to ensure consistency, but will do so when I get a chance (likely tomorrow morning). Posting this now to see if anyone's opposed to the change, or at least the direction of.
Note: It /does/ break backwards compatibility, but it seems that previous logic was incorrect (based on my upcoming checking for consistency between RFCs). As such, I'm not sure that it should be fixed < 3.5. Thoughts? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-08-06 00:45:10 | demian.brecht | set | recipients:
+ demian.brecht, ncoghlan, orsenthil, pitrou, ezio.melotti, Mike.Lissner |
2014-08-06 00:45:10 | demian.brecht | set | messageid: <1407285910.12.0.230751663397.issue22118@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-08-06 00:45:09 | demian.brecht | link | issue22118 messages |
2014-08-06 00:45:09 | demian.brecht | create | |
|