Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, Neil Muller, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, djc, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, python-dev, rjordens, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2014-08-05.01:27:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1407202064.59.0.742124206739.issue21591@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I suspect there may also be a problem if executing pyc code generated the old way (this patch didn't bump the magic number, and doesn't really need to, so that case still needs to be handled).

Restoring the runtime check should cover it (the test can craft a suitable AST by hand rather than going through the now updated compiler)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-08-05 01:27:44ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, djc, Neil Muller, Arfrever, python-dev, rjordens
2014-08-05 01:27:44ncoghlansetmessageid: <1407202064.59.0.742124206739.issue21591@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-08-05 01:27:44ncoghlanlinkissue21591 messages
2014-08-05 01:27:44ncoghlancreate