Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, arjennienhuis, barry, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, durin42, ecir.hana, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, glyph, gregory.p.smith, loewis, martin.panter, ncoghlan, nlevitt@gmail.com, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stendec, terry.reedy, tshepang, uau, underrun, vstinner
Date 2014-07-26.07:00:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1406358002.71.0.37663594214.issue3982@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Right, bytes.format was considered as part of the PEP 461 discussions, and rejected as an operation that only made sense in the text domain: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0461/#proposed-variations

With PEP 461 accepted, and PEP 460 withdrawn, that means we won't be adding bytes.format and bytearray.format.

Issue 20284 covers the implementation of PEP 461.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-26 07:00:02ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, glyph, ezio.melotti, durin42, Arfrever, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, tshepang, underrun, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, nlevitt@gmail.com, stendec
2014-07-26 07:00:02ncoghlansetmessageid: <1406358002.71.0.37663594214.issue3982@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-26 07:00:02ncoghlanlinkissue3982 messages
2014-07-26 07:00:02ncoghlancreate