Author vstinner
Recipients Andrew.Boettcher, ajaksu2, akira, astrand, cvrebert, ericpruitt, eryksun, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, janzert, josiahcarlson, martin.panter, ooooooooo, parameter, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sbt, techtonik, v+python, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-07-23.23:51:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1406159493.72.0.265844627577.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I have implemented and would continue to lean towards continuing to hide BrokenPipeError on the additional API endpoints.

FYI asyncio.Process.communicate() ignores BrokenPipeError and ConnectionResetError, whereas asyncio.Process.stdin.drain() (coroutine to wait until all bytes are written) raises a BrokenPipeError or ConnectionResetError if the child process exited. I think subprocess has the same design.

(I modified recently asyncio to ignore BrokenPipeError in communicate(), it was a bug.)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-23 23:51:34vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, josiahcarlson, astrand, parameter, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, ooooooooo, v+python, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ericpruitt, akira, Andrew.Boettcher, rosslagerwall, sbt, martin.panter, janzert, yselivanov, eryksun
2014-07-23 23:51:33vstinnersetmessageid: <1406159493.72.0.265844627577.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-23 23:51:33vstinnerlinkissue1191964 messages
2014-07-23 23:51:33vstinnercreate