This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients BreamoreBoy, anacrolix, ezio.melotti, frafra, rhettinger
Date 2014-07-19.01:23:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1405733010.37.0.0973179706337.issue17528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Have you seen something like this done for other implementations of LRU caches?  

To me, the idea seems to be at odds with the idea of retaining only the last n calls in memory -- suggesting that a refreshing an outdated entry is cheaper than retiring it to disk and retrieving it later (as you might do with a shelf or database).
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-19 01:23:30rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, ezio.melotti, frafra, anacrolix, BreamoreBoy
2014-07-19 01:23:30rhettingersetmessageid: <1405733010.37.0.0973179706337.issue17528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-19 01:23:30rhettingerlinkissue17528 messages
2014-07-19 01:23:29rhettingercreate