Message223456
Have you seen something like this done for other implementations of LRU caches?
To me, the idea seems to be at odds with the idea of retaining only the last n calls in memory -- suggesting that a refreshing an outdated entry is cheaper than retiring it to disk and retrieving it later (as you might do with a shelf or database). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-07-19 01:23:30 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, ezio.melotti, frafra, anacrolix, BreamoreBoy |
2014-07-19 01:23:30 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1405733010.37.0.0973179706337.issue17528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-07-19 01:23:30 | rhettinger | link | issue17528 messages |
2014-07-19 01:23:29 | rhettinger | create | |
|