Author dhduvall
Recipients alex, benjamin.peterson, dhduvall, gennad, gregory.p.smith, neologix
Date 2014-07-08.17:23:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1404840236.74.0.304096857292.issue20104@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Our project (the Solaris packaging system, IPS), relies on posix_spawn() primarily for the ability to fork without making a large memory reservation (and possibly failing) because the forking process was itself very large.  That's the (a?) bug benefit of posix_spawn() -- it's not a benefit for the programmer using it (who might have to fall back to fork/exec), but for the end-user that benefits from its streamlined operation.

You're right that it doesn't handle everything that subprocess.Popen() does -- though at least on Solaris there's a way to change the cwd in the file actions, and I'm sure we'd consider adding a way to do the setsid() as well.  The rest should be possible cross-platform.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-08 17:23:56dhduvallsetrecipients: + dhduvall, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, alex, neologix, gennad
2014-07-08 17:23:56dhduvallsetmessageid: <1404840236.74.0.304096857292.issue20104@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-08 17:23:56dhduvalllinkissue20104 messages
2014-07-08 17:23:56dhduvallcreate