Message221524
It's not really a particular use case. I was making a function decorator for automatic type checking using annotations (ironically I discovered later there is an almost identical example in the PEP for signatures). But I can't think of any use case when it would be undesirable to include the extra parameters, unless it slows down the code, hence the possibility of a separate method. It would not complicate the API to add behavior that would simplify most applications. And I just realized this is also the behavior of inspect.getcallargs, for which the docs recommend to switch to Signature.bind. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-06-25 04:57:42 | rmccampbell7 | set | recipients:
+ rmccampbell7, r.david.murray, yselivanov |
2014-06-25 04:57:42 | rmccampbell7 | set | messageid: <1403672262.7.0.186876106942.issue21684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-06-25 04:57:42 | rmccampbell7 | link | issue21684 messages |
2014-06-25 04:57:42 | rmccampbell7 | create | |
|