Message220710
I haven't reviewed the patch in detail, but I've had a scan through and it looks *great*. A quick and dirty check that it's "correct" is to compare the number of tests run before and after the patch - and if the numbers differ verifying that it's for good reasons (i.e. only *extra* tests being run and none being skipped / missed).
If that's the case I'd be strongly in favour of applying. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-06-16 11:21:41 | michael.foord | set | recipients:
+ michael.foord, brett.cannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, zach.ware |
2014-06-16 11:21:41 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <1402917701.38.0.45467446089.issue21741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-06-16 11:21:41 | michael.foord | link | issue21741 messages |
2014-06-16 11:21:40 | michael.foord | create | |
|