Message220388
Correction on the XXX should we check this: I was thinking about the wrong section of the code. But it is still 'no': by postel's law we should accept dirty data. Currently the consumer of the library can then decide whether or not to reject the dirty data by building a subclass. It might be nice to provide an option to control rejection of invalid characters in commands, but that should be a separate issue. (And, we are ending up with so many options that we might want to think about whether or not there is a better API for controlling them). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-06-12 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, pitrou, jesstess, zvyn |
2014-06-12 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1402609421.03.0.661156724364.issue21725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-06-12 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | link | issue21725 messages |
2014-06-12 21:43:40 | r.david.murray | create | |
|