➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients taleinat, terry.reedy
Date 2014-06-11.02:42:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1402454559.36.0.212626593537.issue20577@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Backwards from default was the old, svn way. We hg we merge forward within 3.x. "ready to commit to 3.4 and merge to 3.5.". If you started with 3.5, then you would have to do a null merge of the 3.4 patch into 3.5. It is occasionally done when people decide to backport to maintenacne sometime later, but much nastier.

Feel free to ask any other questions.

Review: pep8, yes!.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-06-11 02:42:39terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, taleinat
2014-06-11 02:42:39terry.reedysetmessageid: <1402454559.36.0.212626593537.issue20577@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-06-11 02:42:39terry.reedylinkissue20577 messages
2014-06-11 02:42:38terry.reedycreate