Message219350
It may be the correct behavior but that doesn't mean we cannot update the repr to be more informative. We've already done that for a number of types that previously used the default __repr__() implementation. So in the case, how hard would it be to have the following repr?
>>> zip([1, 2, 3], ["a", "b", "c"])
zip([1, 2, 3], ["a", "b", "c"]) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-05-29 16:38:53 | eric.snow | set | recipients:
+ eric.snow, SilentGhost, Sasha.Ovsankin |
2014-05-29 16:38:53 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1401381533.26.0.0146983524721.issue21607@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-05-29 16:38:53 | eric.snow | link | issue21607 messages |
2014-05-29 16:38:52 | eric.snow | create | |
|