Message218590
You'd prefer it say it returns 1 on success and 0 on failure? Or non-zero on success, zero on failure?
Is true/false that bad? After all, C says 0 is false, all other integer values are true; phrasing it as zero vs. non-zero may be slightly more technically accurate, but it's also a bit less readable, while 1 vs. 0 constrains the implementation (so you couldn't introduce a third "success but with additional info" state, similar to the third possible return from a "O&" converter function). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-05-15 02:18:32 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r, docs@python, Banger |
2014-05-15 02:18:32 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1400120312.28.0.766994433431.issue21508@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-05-15 02:18:32 | josh.r | link | issue21508 messages |
2014-05-15 02:18:31 | josh.r | create | |
|