Author Jim.Jewett
Recipients Arfrever, Claudiu.Popa, Jim.Jewett, ncoghlan, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2014-05-13.11:39:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CA+OGgf74sb93DdhwjeBWD-1UQyHQG68AqUrse9EG1UPaBYYahA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1399980189.41.0.276680139446.issue19385@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Did you try 3.5 without the patch, in case the issue is not with his code?
On May 13, 2014 7:23 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> Claudiu, your benchmark is broken, it measure a no-op.
>
> Correct benchmark:
>
>     $ ./python -S -m timeit -n 100000 -s "import dbm.dumb as dbm;
> d=dbm.open('x.dat', 'c')"  "len(d)"
>
> 3.4:  100000 loops, best of 3: 2.56 usec per loop
> 3.5:  100000 loops, best of 3: 4.17 usec per loop
>
> There is 60% regression.
>
> ----------
> status: closed -> open
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19385>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2014-05-13 11:39:25Jim.Jewettsetrecipients: + Jim.Jewett, ncoghlan, Arfrever, Claudiu.Popa, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2014-05-13 11:39:25Jim.Jewettlinkissue19385 messages
2014-05-13 11:39:25Jim.Jewettcreate