This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro, tiwilliam
Date 2014-04-28.18:22:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1398709321.48.0.427240583039.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> So I'd suggest, instead of using an hardcoded value, to simply reuse io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE.
> That way, if some day we decide to change it, all user code wil benefit from the change.

I don't think io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE makes much sense as a heuristic for the gzip module (or compressed files in general). Perhaps gzip should get its own DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-28 18:22:01pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, neologix, serhiy.storchaka, tiwilliam
2014-04-28 18:22:01pitrousetmessageid: <1398709321.48.0.427240583039.issue20962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-28 18:22:01pitroulinkissue20962 messages
2014-04-28 18:22:01pitroucreate