Author neologix
Recipients josh.r, jtaylor, neologix, njs, pitrou, skrah, vstinner
Date 2014-04-27.15:59:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM0A+Yko4U4fr_P6i+t7uow+_Q+gmG36d++bCCy6YW=mKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1398613381.6.0.0251398335923.issue21233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> __libc_calloc() starts with a check on integer overflow.

Yes, see my previous message:
"""
AFAICT, the two arguments are purely historical (it was used when
malloc() didn't guarantee suitable alignment, and has the advantage of
performing overflow check when doing the multiplication, but in our
code we always check for it anyway).
"""
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-27 15:59:55neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, pitrou, vstinner, njs, skrah, jtaylor, josh.r
2014-04-27 15:59:55neologixlinkissue21233 messages
2014-04-27 15:59:55neologixcreate