Author vstinner
Recipients akira, shankarunni, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-04-26.23:38:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1398555532.46.0.261091653857.issue21302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I know that an earlier request to use nanosleep() has been rejected as "wontfix"

It was the issue #13981. I created this issue while I worked on the PEP 410 (nanosecond timestamp). I closed the issue myself, it doesn't mean that Python must not use the function, just that I didn't want to work on it anymore at this time.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-26 23:38:52vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, akira, yselivanov, shankarunni
2014-04-26 23:38:52vstinnersetmessageid: <1398555532.46.0.261091653857.issue21302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-26 23:38:52vstinnerlinkissue21302 messages
2014-04-26 23:38:52vstinnercreate