Message217225
> I know that an earlier request to use nanosleep() has been rejected as "wontfix"
It was the issue #13981. I created this issue while I worked on the PEP 410 (nanosecond timestamp). I closed the issue myself, it doesn't mean that Python must not use the function, just that I didn't want to work on it anymore at this time. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-04-26 23:38:52 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, akira, yselivanov, shankarunni |
2014-04-26 23:38:52 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1398555532.46.0.261091653857.issue21302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-04-26 23:38:52 | vstinner | link | issue21302 messages |
2014-04-26 23:38:52 | vstinner | create | |
|