Message216261
OK, looks good. I tried your test with my earlier workaround and the wrapper got deallocated too early, proving that my workaround was indeed wrong and your test is useful. I am still concerned theoretically that the CoroWrapper.send() signature is different from a real generator's send() method, but I think that send() to a coroutine is an internal detail anyway, so I can live with that, and I don't see another work-around.
When you commit, can you do upstgream (Tulip) first? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-04-15 01:19:26 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, python-dev, yselivanov, richard.kiss |
2014-04-15 01:19:26 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1397524766.86.0.894076633951.issue21209@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-04-15 01:19:26 | gvanrossum | link | issue21209 messages |
2014-04-15 01:19:26 | gvanrossum | create | |
|