Message215968
I faced this particular issue by writing decorators for asyncio coroutines.
I even posted a question to SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23015626/how-to-decorate-an-asyncio-coroutine-to-retain-its-name
However, since that I realized the problem is more general. I believe that a generator object should inherit its function's __name__ attribute instead of ignoring it. Example:
################################################################
import functools
def decorated(genfunc):
@functools.wraps(genfunc)
def wrapper(*args, **kargs):
print('inside wrapper')
for x in genfunc(*args, **kargs):
yield 'decorated: {!r}'.format(x)
print('outside wrapper')
print('wrapper.__name__: {!r}'.format(wrapper.__name__))
return wrapper
@decorated
def simple_genfunc():
"""Testdoc."""
yield from range(10)
if __name__ == '__main__':
print('simple_genfunc.__name__: {!r}'.format(
simple_genfunc.__name__))
print('simple_genfunc().__name__: {!r}'.format(
simple_genfunc().__name__))
################################################################
And its result:
Z:\>python -i genfuncdec.py
outside wrapper
wrapper.__name__: 'simple_genfunc'
simple_genfunc.__name__: 'simple_genfunc'
simple_genfunc().__name__: 'wrapper'
>>> simple_genfunc
<function simple_genfunc at 0x00C30420>
>>> simple_genfunc.__wrapped__
<function simple_genfunc at 0x00C304B0>
>>> simple_genfunc()
<generator object wrapper at 0x00C0EE18>
>>> simple_genfunc.__wrapped__()
<generator object simple_genfunc at 0x00C0ED28>
As you can see the generator object's __name__ remained the hardcoded one. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-04-12 11:14:07 | SzieberthAdam | set | recipients:
+ SzieberthAdam |
2014-04-12 11:14:07 | SzieberthAdam | set | messageid: <1397301247.66.0.634427842107.issue21205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-04-12 11:14:07 | SzieberthAdam | link | issue21205 messages |
2014-04-12 11:14:06 | SzieberthAdam | create | |
|