Author josh.r
Recipients garybernhardt, gdr@garethrees.org, josh.r, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, skrah, vstinner
Date 2014-04-09.21:26:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1397078773.69.0.876869188125.issue20539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Mark, you said:

> OverflowError seems to have the majority vote. I'll change it to that.

But your most recent patch seems to have gone back to ValueError for both cases. Is there a reason for that? FWIW, I favor OverflowError as the "too large" type, though I prefer the less hyperbolic phrasing of the error message in the new patch.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-09 21:26:13josh.rsetrecipients: + josh.r, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, skrah, gdr@garethrees.org, garybernhardt
2014-04-09 21:26:13josh.rsetmessageid: <1397078773.69.0.876869188125.issue20539@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-09 21:26:13josh.rlinkissue20539 messages
2014-04-09 21:26:13josh.rcreate