Author josiahcarlson
Recipients Andrew.Boettcher, ajaksu2, astrand, cvrebert, ericpruitt, eryksun, giampaolo.rodola, janzert, josiahcarlson, ooooooooo, parameter, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sbt, techtonik, v+python
Date 2014-04-04.07:01:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1396594916.93.0.389885499049.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Quick update before I head to bed.

Thank you for the input, I had gotten the individual async calls working a couple days ago, and I was just working to replace the communicate() method for Windows.

Yes, I'm using asyncio._overlapped, though asyncio uses subprocessing, so I needed to defer import of _overlapped until one of a couple crucial methods were being called in order to prevent issues relating to circular imports.

I also ended up moving asyncio.windows_utils.pipe out to subprocess, as copying/pasting it for a third 'create an overlapped-io pipe' implementation for the standard library just doesn't make a lot of sense, and another circular import seemed like a bad idea. If/when subprocess goes away completely, someone else can move the function back.

With overlapped IOs able to be cancelled, it's not all that bad to make a completely re-entrant communicate() without threads, though I made a few mistakes in my first pass tonight that I need to fix tomorrow.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-04 07:01:57josiahcarlsonsetrecipients: + josiahcarlson, astrand, parameter, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, ooooooooo, v+python, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ericpruitt, Andrew.Boettcher, rosslagerwall, sbt, janzert, eryksun
2014-04-04 07:01:56josiahcarlsonsetmessageid: <1396594916.93.0.389885499049.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-04 07:01:56josiahcarlsonlinkissue1191964 messages
2014-04-04 07:01:56josiahcarlsoncreate