This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients alex, benjamin.peterson, eryksun, holdenweb, methane, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2014-03-30.23:34:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1396222480.26.0.526530675755.issue21074@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> check parameters before compute the result is simple

Handling the general case (all sequences and all operators) isn't really simple.  It also involves doing more computations and making more assumptions than we want to do in this code (it is not a great place to be  running code that could raise exceptions, trigger GC, etc).

I admire your inclination to "fix" this but doing so makes it slower and more fragile.  This code has worked well for a long time and we should be reluctant to muck with it just to handle an arcane case that has a trivially easy work-around.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-30 23:34:40rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, holdenweb, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, alex, methane, eryksun
2014-03-30 23:34:40rhettingersetmessageid: <1396222480.26.0.526530675755.issue21074@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-30 23:34:40rhettingerlinkissue21074 messages
2014-03-30 23:34:39rhettingercreate