Author nikratio
Recipients Ben.Darnell, christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, nikratio, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2014-03-26.02:51:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <53324092.4020902@rath.org>
In-reply-to <1395798837.72.0.670467013829.issue20951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On 03/25/2014 06:53 PM, Ben Darnell wrote:
> Another option may be to have SSLSocket.send() convert the WANT_WRITE exception into a socket.error with errno EAGAIN.  This wouldn't break Tornado and would make socket.send and SSLSocket.send more consistent, but it's weird to hide the true error like this.

I think that would only make sense if the SSLWant{Read/Write}Error
exceptions are eliminated completely, so that all methods raise
BlockingError (==EAGAIN) instead.

Raising BlockingError is marginally better than returning zero, but I
think not worth the change.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-26 02:51:06nikratiosetrecipients: + nikratio, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, Ben.Darnell
2014-03-26 02:51:06nikratiolinkissue20951 messages
2014-03-26 02:51:06nikratiocreate