➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Gareth.Gouldstone
Recipients Gareth.Gouldstone, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, r.david.murray, twouters
Date 2014-03-21.08:54:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1395392086.17.0.393000609751.issue21002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Scanner may not be a public interface but it is widely documented, not least on page 67 of the O'reilly Python Cookbook.

Even if Scanner is not made public, then surely it should maintain consistency with the public interfaces?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-21 08:54:46Gareth.Gouldstonesetrecipients: + Gareth.Gouldstone, twouters, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, r.david.murray
2014-03-21 08:54:46Gareth.Gouldstonesetmessageid: <1395392086.17.0.393000609751.issue21002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-21 08:54:46Gareth.Gouldstonelinkissue21002 messages
2014-03-21 08:54:46Gareth.Gouldstonecreate