Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, alex, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2014-03-20.21:35:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1395351314.26.0.777833942628.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> The string I'm proposing has been carefully crafted in order to get 
> the ciphers in a very particular order. That order is basically - 1)
> Security of the cipher itself 2) PFS 3) Performance while also
> maintaining compatibility both forwards and backwards.

I still think the ciphers list should be open-ended, i.e. have "HIGH" somewhere at the end.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-20 21:35:14pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, ncoghlan, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, alex, r.david.murray, dstufft
2014-03-20 21:35:14pitrousetmessageid: <1395351314.26.0.777833942628.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-20 21:35:14pitroulinkissue20995 messages
2014-03-20 21:35:14pitroucreate