Author barry
Recipients barry, berker.peksag, jnoller, python-dev, r.david.murray, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2014-03-20.13:46:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20140320094653.678bfe00@anarchist.wooz.org>
In-reply-to <1395322351.21.0.473081426528.issue20976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Mar 20, 2014, at 01:32 PM, R. David Murray wrote:

>Well, one reason is I was afraid mailman might be using them.  So if you are
>cool with it, that removes that objection.

Nope, neither the 2.1 or 3.0 code uses those methods AFAICT.

>The other reason was that it seemed they were being used "from" utils on
>purpose, as a design thing.  I did not take the time to do a full analysis,
>since Victor wanted to get his patch in.

I suspect it's just left over cruft from the early days of the email/mimelib
code.

>So, if you've taken a look and you think there's no reason to keep them the
>way they are, then I'm fine with it.

Do you want the honors? :)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-20 13:46:57barrysetrecipients: + barry, vstinner, jnoller, r.david.murray, python-dev, sbt, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka
2014-03-20 13:46:57barrylinkissue20976 messages
2014-03-20 13:46:57barrycreate