Author pitrou
Recipients christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, nikratio, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2014-03-19.18:38:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1395254308.5.0.966367500263.issue20951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't think complicating the situation by exposing two different kinds of non-blocking sockets is the solution here.

Either we decide it is worth breaking compatibility and we change the behaviour by default (I'm rather against this), or we simply document the discrepancy.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-19 18:38:28pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, janssen, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, nikratio
2014-03-19 18:38:28pitrousetmessageid: <1395254308.5.0.966367500263.issue20951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-19 18:38:28pitroulinkissue20951 messages
2014-03-19 18:38:28pitroucreate