Author gvanrossum
Recipients christian.heimes, felipecruz, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, jcea, meador.inge, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, rosslagerwall, sbt, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-03-17.21:21:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJLA6oGqg0Jd-0+-yGfhMM_+yVsq2eXDBG=U25UPafvOcQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1395091059.82.0.383414336356.issue18931@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I actually prefer some code duplication in this case. Makes the review
easier.
On Mar 17, 2014 2:17 PM, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
>
> Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4.
> I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first
> though).
> The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so
> I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code
> duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18931>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-17 21:21:51gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, meador.inge, neologix, rosslagerwall, python-dev, sbt, felipecruz, yselivanov
2014-03-17 21:21:51gvanrossumlinkissue18931 messages
2014-03-17 21:21:51gvanrossumcreate