Author ncoghlan
Recipients Jurko.Gospodnetić, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan, ned.deily, r.david.murray, takluyver
Date 2014-03-12.22:03:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CADiSq7coifJMwUxmwiC3Ga58ryW=sZpDqCkqh_cvitWGqQOnPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1394660461.82.0.193425093434.issue20884@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I'm not sure Brett's plan is such a great idea. If you look at the file
attributes in my demo above, they include a leading path element (based on
the executable location), so it *is* possible to use the pkgutil data
access APIs sensibly from a frozen module (and even when there's no path
component, I believe the recommended way of invoking pkgutil would fall
back to the current directory).

So I don't think we should decide what to do without first comparing the
behaviour of frozen pkgutil.get_data dependent code between 3.3 and 3.4.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-12 22:03:59ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, barry, brett.cannon, ned.deily, r.david.murray, Jurko.Gospodnetić, eric.snow, takluyver
2014-03-12 22:03:59ncoghlanlinkissue20884 messages
2014-03-12 22:03:59ncoghlancreate